Do you believe in the world's most extensive conspiracy theory - "Human-made global warming" (Also known as "Human-Made Climate Change)? See this:

Anthropogenic cause "Global climate crisis" - "the world's most extensive conspiracy theory"

Do you believe in the world's most extensive conspiracy theory?
Known as "Human-made global warming" or 
"Human-Made Climate Change"

By Jim T. Slaaen



How many of you who actually claim that human-made CO₂ is the main cause of climate change know that nature itself is responsible for 98.72% of all emissions of so-called "greenhouse gases". In comparison, the anthropogenic contribution is ONLY 0.28%. CO₂'s part of so-called "Greenhouse gases" is only around 3.618%, The nature's part of 3.618%, is ca. 3.503%, and the anthropogenic contribution is only 0.117%. Why do you think the Green Fascists don't tell you that? The answer to that is that the truth destroys their lies completely. 

Natural Greenhouse gasses vs anthropogenic contribution 


Only a handful of countries have to cut
their "Greenhouse gas"-emissions, according to COP21 (2015 Paris Agreement), not ALL.
WHY, if there really is a climate crisis?

If emissions of these so-called "greenhouse gases" really have a demonstrable impact on the climate; Why do the climate hysterics and Green Fascists believe that the anthropogenic contribution, which corresponds to only 2.8‰ (per thousand) of what nature itself emits, is MORE harmful to the climate than the nature itself? Can someone explain it, preferably with a link to empirical real scientific evidence based on real observations and records that follow the standard of the scientific method, and is clear evidence that we the people who live in Japan, Canada, The United States, and in West Europa (EU, including the EEA (Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway), Switzerland and Great Britain), is causing the alleged "man-made climate change" since we are the only ones who are forced to reduce our CO₂ emissions according to the 2015 Paris Agreement?
Another big issue: Where exactly is this climate change if it is the end of the world if we do nothing now according to Green Fascist doomniks?

The world's most "greenhouse gas"-polluting country is China. China has been allowed and will be allowed to increase its emissions of so-called greenhouse gases according to the Paris Agreement from 2015 (COP21) by an enormous 450% higher than the 1990 level. The country in the world which is the third largest "greenhouse gas"-polluting country is India. India will be allowed to increase its emissions by 495%. China and India are not alone in being allowed to increase their emissions if you actually believe so. If there really is a human made "CO₂-caused climate crisis", why should any country in the world be allowed to increase its emissions?

These are the countries that are allowed to
increase their emissions according to COP21:

• China - Ranking place 1st. for "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 29.18%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 450%

• India- Ranking place 3rd. on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 7.09%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 495%

• South Korea - Ranking 9th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.69%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by78%

• Indonesia - Ranking 10th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.48%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 535%

• Saudi Arabia - Ranking 11th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.45%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by up to 562%


• Brazil - Ranking 12th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.29%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 76%

• Mexico - Ranking 13th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.23%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 72%

• Australia - Ranking 14th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.16%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 4-7%

• Turkey - Ranking 16th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.03%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 356%

• Emirates - Ranking 28th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.61%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 396%

• Vietnam - Ranking place 29 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.58%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 1,164%

• Argentina - Ranking 30th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.56%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 80%

• Philippines - Ranking 36th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.35%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 0-13%

• Chile - Ranking 44th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.23%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 151%

• Morocco - Ranking place 54 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.16%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 347%

• Peru - Ranking place 55 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.16%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 143%

• New Zealand - Ranking place 74 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.09%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 72%

•Kenya - Ranking place 91 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world by 0.05%:
Increase their Greenhouse gas emissions by 201%

• Ethiopia - Ranking place 98 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.03%:
An increase of 250%


These are the only countries that have to
cut their emissions according to COP21:

• USA - Ranking place 2nd. on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 14.02%:
Cut their Greenhouse gas emissions by 10-17% (Trump withdrew the USA from the agreement. Biden re-introduced it)

• Japan - Ranking 5th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 3.47%:
Cut their Greenhouse gas emissions by 15%

• Canada - Ranking place 7 on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 1.89%:
Cut their Greenhouse gas emissions by 7-17%

• EU (including the EEA (Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway), Switzerland, and Great Britain), Ranking place? on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world by ?%:
Cut their Greenhouse gas emissions by 40%

• Norway - Ranking 64th on "Greenhouse gas emissions" in the world with 0.12%:
Cut their Greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 55%


Ask yourself why little Norway is the country in the world that has to cut the most of all countries in the world, even though our emissions ONLY amount to 4‰ (per thousand) of what China emits and they will be allowed to increase their emissions by enormous values ​​while we are to halve? The answer to that is not to be found in climate issues that for sure. There are COMPLETELY other reasons why we in the Western Word and Japan should be affected in a way that puts our entire free existence as free countries and people at risk - NOT the climate changes caused by humans...

The goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological disaster but to destroy capitalism

Not everyone has forgotten that at a press conference in October 2015 in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological disaster but to destroy capitalism. Doesn't that say enough?

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism/


The south polar ice cap of Mars is melting

It wouldn't surprise me that Green Fascists actually believe that the ice at the South Pole on Mars is melting due to "man-made climate change" too.

https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/07aug_southpole

The south polar ice cap of Mars is melting

The temperature increases before CO₂ increases according to real science

Empirical evidence from core drill samples from the Vostok ice shows temperature increases before CO₂ increases in every piece with a difference of about 800 years. Scientific facts that cause the Green Fascists to have a mega attack of cognitive dissonance. The question is how does the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) determine that an increase in atmospheric CO₂ causes an increase in global temperature? The answer is actually as unscientific as it gets. They just assumed that was the case…
Did someone say scientific? It is not scientific when climate scientists do not follow the scientific method in all their work. Assumptions are not science and never have been.

https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/co2/vostok.html


Milanković cycles

What the climate hysterics and Green Fascists call "man-made climate change", I primarily call seasons, of which we have four all over our globe. Spring, summer, autumn, and winter. These four seasons are a natural effect of the tilt of the Earth's axis in relation to the Sun. The reason for the changes in these seasons is the fact that the Earth rotates around the Sun in a plane, while the Earth's self-rotation around its own axis has an inclination, which is currently approx. 23.5° in relation to the plane of rotation around the Sun. The Earth makes one trip around the Sun in 365.2421891 days. The Earth's rotation around its own axis takes 24.0000006 hours.
In addition, the tilt of the Earth's axis varies between 22.1° and 24.5° over a period of 41,000 years. "Axial precession", is a slow change in the Earth's axis of rotation caused by the attraction (gravity) of our Solar System's two largest gas giant planets, Jupiter and Saturn. The phenomenon of the movement of the Earth's axis is similar to the movement of the rotation axis in a spinning bass. Only in 25,800 years will the Earth's axis of rotation point in the same direction as it does today. The axis of rotation changes direction by approximately 50 arcseconds per year over a period of 26,000 years. Another variable is the Earth's "orbital eccentricity". A variation in the orbit The Earth rotates around the Sun from an approximately perfectly circular orbit to an elliptical orbit over a period of between 100,000 and 413,000 years. It is mainly these regular changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun and the Earth's axis of rotation as well as changes in the Sun's intensity, solar storms, etc., that create changes in the climate on Earth and have done so in the unforeseeable past and will continue to do so in the unforeseeable future.
These three variations are:
  1. The inclination angle (tilt) of the Earth's axis. 
  2. The axial precession of the Earth's axis
  3. The orbital eccentricity of the Earth's orbit 
Milanković Cycles

These three variations are called Milanković cycles. It is mainly this variation that creates changes in climate on Earth together with the changes that occur on the Sun over time.


That the Milanković cycles are totally unknown to many of those who believe in the world's biggest conspiracy theory - "man-made climate change", or those who even reject those cycles as having anything to do with climate change, is nothing new at all. It says a lot about the level of knowledge when Green-fascists actually don't understand that the Milanković cycles change the angle of the sun's light and thus vary where the most intense point of the sun's rays hits the earth, which will lead to climate change. It is quite self-explained that when the "center" of the sun's light contact surface is constantly changing, there is also a change in the climate. Even further out in the sunbeam's contact area, there will be noticeable changes, because the intensity of the sunbeam has changed from what it was. Like melting North Pole ice, Greenland's glaciers, or other glaciers. But advanced thinking like that is green fascists not capable of understanding until they wake up from their one-track thinking about "man-made climate change" and open up their eyes to see realities rather than the fantasy of the IPCC and others.

That these three variations, called the Milanković cycles, lead to changes on Earth is a logic that even caged chickens and battery hens understand from when they were newborn chickens. They know that standing right next to the infrared heat bulb emits more heat than if they stand 10 m from the same heat bulb. But the Milanković cycles thus reject pseudo-scientists who are paid by the IPCC (so that they will get a salary) one of those variations is one of the biggest contributions to climate change on Earth. But when the youth is indoctrinated by a socialist teaching staff who barely know the back and forth of a pen or pencil and ONLY have a few years of teacher training which does not even set a decent requirement for a certain level in science to call themselves a teacher, well that says why it is teeming with socialist sprouts infected by the climate hysteria virus...

I think the Green Fascists are the lost-cases products of really brainwashed people who have no real knowledge whatsoever about almost anything. They are so indoctrinated that the anthropogenic CO₂ contribution is the driving force behind global warming which is actually nothing else but natural variation in the temperature of the earth mainly due to the varying intensity of the sun and these three variations: the tilt angle of the Earth's axis, the axial precession of the Earth's axis and the orbital eccentricity of the Earth's orbit. Three variations are called the Milanković cycles.

The sun's illumination on earth


The inclination angle of the Earth's axis (the axial tilt of the earth)

The tilt angle of the Earth's axis varies between 22.1° and 24.5° over a period of 41,000 years.

Illustration showing the axial tilt of the earth


Video Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech



The axial precession of the Earth's axis

Axial precession is a gravity-induced, slow and continuous change in the orientation of the Earth's rotational axis and the gradual shift in the orientation of the Earth's rotational axis in a cycle of approximately 26,000. A movement of the Earth's axis reminiscent of a spinning bass top.



Illustration showing the Earth's precession


Animation of the Earth's precession



Video Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech


The orbital eccentricity of the Earth's orbit

Eccentricity: The Earth's annual pilgrimage around the Sun is not completely circular, but in our time it is quite close. Over time, the gravitational force from our Solar System's two largest gas giant planets, Jupiter and Saturn, is the reason why the shape of the Earth's orbit varies from an almost circular to a slightly elliptical orbit.

Eccentricity measures how much the shape of the Earth's orbit goes from a perfect circle to an ellipse. These variations affect the distance between the Earth and the Sun. Eccentricity causes our seasons to be slightly different lengths, with Northern Hemisphere summers currently about 4.5 days longer than winters, and springs about three days longer than autumns. As the eccentricity decreases, the length of our seasons gradually evens out.

The difference in distance between Earth's closest approach to the Sun (known as perihelion), which occurs on or about January 3 each year, and its furthest departure from the Sun (known as aphelion) which occurs on or about July 4, is currently approx. 5.1 million kilometers (3.2 million miles), a variation of 3.4%. This means that every January there is about 6.8% more incoming solar radiation that hits the Earth than it does in July.

When the Earth's orbit is at its most elliptical, about 23% more incoming solar radiation hits the Earth at the planet's closest approach to the Sun each year than it does at its furthest departure from the Sun. Currently, the Earth's eccentricity is close to its least elliptical (most circular) orbit and is decreasing very slowly in a cycle spanning 100,000 years.


The Earth's Eccentricity

Video Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech


Example of what the Earth's axial precession causes of changes over time

If Green Fascists actually had managed to understand what the following picture actually shows, perhaps they would have learned something useful, and not been so fanatically concerned with the anthropogenic CO₂ contribution, which means nothing for climate change. The red arrows are the direction of the Earth's axis through the 4 seasons in relation to the Sun at various times due to just one of the Milanković cycles...

Earth axial precession


How increasing CO₂ leads to an increased negative greenhouse effect in Antarctica

How will Green fascists explain this, if an increased CO₂ level really causes an increase in temperature?

https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066749


The medieval Warm Period is the main reason for today's CO₂ increase. Not industrialization nor the anthropogenic contribution to CO₂

Ask yourself, and if you are a Green fascist for once use your brain to think a bit logically yourself: - whether the increase in CO₂ that we have experienced for a while comes from completely different reasons than human influence. Did you get what I mentioned earlier, that empirical evidence from core drill samples from the Vostok ice shows temperature increases before CO₂ increases in every single sample with a difference of about 800 years? Then take the Medieval Warm Period from around the year 1000 until around 1400 and add 800 years to both. Then we're in the period from the year 1800 to the year 2200 with a higher CO₂ level as a result of the Medieval Warm Period as the main reason for the CO₂ increase. Not industrialization nor the anthropogenic contribution to CO₂ as the climate hysterics would desperately try to make you believe. All real scientists know this. Only those who depend on keeping up lying to get paid say otherwise. Plus the Green fascist tadpoles and the Fake Mainstream Media...
The Medieval Warm Period that IPCC and Michael Mann have tried to erase


Ice core drilling in Greenland indicates the following temperature fluctuations over the past 10,000 years.


Ice core drilling in Greenland indicates the following temperature and CO₂ fluctuations over the past 10,000 years.




Getting rid of the Medieval Warm Period is not the only forgery attempt that was done by Green Fascist scientists  

E-mail from Tom Wigley to Phil Jones from Sept. 27, 2009 - "Make the 1940s warming blip go away"



Michael Man's Nature Trick to Hide The Decline
Picture Credit: Josh at "Cartoons by Josh"
(https://cartoonsbyjosh.co.uk/)


IPCC's Climatechange report 1990 vs IPCC's Climatechange report 2001

Dr. Tim Ball Defeats Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann’s Climate Lawsuit

The Supreme Court of British Columbia has dismissed Dr. Michael Mann’s defamation lawsuit against Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball. 
https://climatechangedispatch.com/tim-ball-defeats-michael-mann-lawsuit/

Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, first published in 1998  was featured prominently in the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (U.N. IPCC 2001 climate report). The graph showed a spike in global average temperature in the 20th Century after about 500 years of stability. Real scientists have long claimed Mann’s graph was fraudulent. There is no sign of The Medieval Warm Period, which indicates that the IPCC and Michael Mann have tried to erase it.

Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, published in 1998: 
https://www.nature.com/articles/33859

The 1st assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (U.N. IPCC 1990:
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf

The 3rd assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (U.N. IPCC 2001:
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/WGI_TAR_full_report.pdf

Print Screen of graphs on page 250 in IPCCs full report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1990 


Print Screen of graphs on page 14 in IPCCs full report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001 


Tampering with actual data

Take a closer look at the first graph on the print screen of graphs on page 14 in IPCC's full report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001.  

IPCC's average temperature in 1921, shows ca. -0.27°C, but according to history 1921 was
 one of the warmest years in recorded time in most of the world according to actual data. 


This graph from NASA in 1999, shows that the year 1921 was the second warmest year between 1880
and 1999 with an anomaly of +1,2°C, only 1944 was warmer with an anomaly of +1,4°C.
That is quite far from IPCC's average temperature graph for 1921 from 2001 with their -0.27°C


The New York Herald September 4, 1921


A segment from the article in The New York Herald on September 4, 1921

  
Lake Morat in the Cantons of Fribourg and Vaud in Switzerland dried out in 1921

Follow this link to see Lake Morat yourselves just now - today on a webcam:
https://www.snow-online.com/webcam/murten--morat--see.htm


Monthly Weather Report of the British Meteorological Office from October 1921


The earth's CO₂-level during the last 450 million years

Did you know that the earth's CO₂-level has been much higher most of the time the earth has existed than it is today? At least for approximately 90% of the last 450 million years? Tell me with evidence and according to real empirical science why suddenly the earth's CO₂-level is so much more dangerous to life on earth now compared to approximately 90% of the last 450 million years? A gas that is ABSOLUTE necessary for creating, obtaining, and keeping life on our planet. If the CO₂-level falls to 150 ppm or beneath, ALL life on earth will perish. That's a known scientific fact that any real scientist knows. You are not THAT stupid that you believe the world's most extensive conspiracy theory - "Human-made global warming" (Also known as "Human-Made Climate Change), caused by some small changes in the CO₂-level, are you?


Did you know that the earth's CO₂-level have being much higher
than it is today for approximately 90% of the last 450 million years?


Data of today

Both NOAA's Trend Per Decade and Trend Per Century show cooling, not heating 
According to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's) National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), the trend in the time series from 2015 to 2021 of global land and ocean surface temperature anomalies is NOT heating, but cooling.
See for yourself at NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Climate at a Glance: Global Time Series, published in January 2022 at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/, if you don't believe my words.


NOAA's and NCEI's 2015-2021 trend:-0,09°C/Decade or -0,88°C/Century






Actual statement: "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period"




From the Trend 2015 to 2021 the earth is actually cooling at the speed of 0,09°C/Decade or 0,88°C/Century, not heating.

Global warming can't lead to colder weather

Dr. Roy Spencer. A meteorologist,
a NASA scientist and climate scientist

On January 31, 2011, meteorologist Dr. Roy W. Spencer noted that "No serious climate scientist, including those I disagree with, believes that global warming can lead to colder weather unless they have been disillusioned as a result of some kind of mental illness."




"Global Warming" relative to the Earth's average temperature

Did you know that on August 23, 2022 "Global Warming" relative to the Earth's average temperature from 1979 to 2000, compared to the Earth's average temperature on August 23, 2022, was increased by a whopping 0°C?

Did someone say "GlobalWarming"?


A brief history of Settled Science
Image credit: cartoonist Ramirez of the Weekly Standard,
via http://www.ibdeditorials.com/cartoons.



What scientists say vs. what non-scientists say


The Scientific Methode then and now

What's science?

People need to understand the huge difference between academia and a real scientist

Allan Savoy about what's real science...


Once 100 scientists signed a letter against Einstein’s theory of relativity.
Einstein’s answer was “They didn’t need 100 signatures. They just need 1 fact”


How peer-reviewed pseudoscientist community (supporting and/or get paid by the IPCC) that believes in the world's most extensive conspiracy theory - "Human-made global warming", treat real scientists that follow the scientific method in all their work and actually study what the real historical and today's empiric data and real empiric science shows. Not the horror-fairytales that need to push the conspiracy theory to have an income. Image credit: Cartoonist Medi Belortaja at Irancartoon


The difference between Science and Religion 






A graph you never will see posted by anyone supporting or get paid by IPCC

Also a graph you never will see posted by anyone supporting or get paid by IPCC


The party leader of the Green Fascist (MDG) in Norway:
"The problem is that we go to elections in a democracy"


Green Fascists are exactly like other fascists


NRK (The public service broadcaster in Norway) uses intimidation propaganda aimed at children


No wonder scared children like the famous Swedish private high school sophomore drop-out like the propagandist Greta Thunberg also tuned in to scare even more children to death with her blind belief in the world's most extensive conspiracy theory - "Human-made global warming" (Also known as "Human-Made Climate Change). She made her parents rich also for pushing the IPCC scam. How many children have taken their life just because of Greta's intimidation propaganda in her "How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood"-speech on November 23, 2019?

Greta Thunberg to world leaders: "How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood"


Fact-Checking the "Green Fascist Jugend" Greta Thunberg
 

Nazi Fascist Jugend vs the Swedish Green Fascist Jugend.
History repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as a farce - Karl Marx

Did you know that Greta Thunberg is a "Copy-Cat"?

How many of you actually know that the "Green Fascist Jugend" Greta Thunberg is a "Copy-Cat" of another scared girl named Severn Cullis-Suzuki who spoke something very similar to Grata Thunberg at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, in Brazil, 3-14 June 1992?

Severn Cullis-Suzuki at Rio Summit 1992




Info credit:

I would like to thank Tony Heller (aka Steven Goddard) from Real Climate Science for some part of the info. 



Don't call the facts - hate speech. It just shows a total lack of knowledge if you do.

For the King, the Fatherland, and the honor of our flag.




Norway - a Christian, free, independent, and indivisible kingdom
Source: The Constitution of the Kingdom of Norway Article 1.




Images and materials used as documentation are communicated per
section 23 of the Intellectual Property Act, Creative Commons license in
Norwegian Law for use in teaching, training, and commentary.





Populære innlegg fra denne bloggen

Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Green Fascism, and Social Democracy belong to the same ideology - Socialism!

Bilde
Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Green Fascism and Social Democracy belong to the same ideology - Socialism! by Jim T. Slaaen This is a translation of one of my previously written articles in Norwegian, into English. The original article written in Norwegian was posted on September 11, 2018 (article down for the moment). Since there has been a lot of interest in this article, especially from the United States, and not least socialists in both mainstream media and so-called "Fact-checkers" denying the true origin of Nazism as Socialism, I now made an English translation of my article. In fact, completely FakeNews!  Faktisk.no - Actually engages in the falsification of history and publishes FakeNews Faktisk.no regularly engages in the  falsification of history Link to the Norwegian Fake News Article: https://www.faktisk.no/faktasjekker/6R6/nei-hitlers-parti-nsdap-var-ikke-sosterpartiet-til-det-norske-arbeiderpartiet Warning to all: Do not use som
Les mer her

Høyre, Venstre, Arbeiderpartiet og FrP på vei å gjøre regjeringen og Stortinget til en ulovlig regjering og et ulovlig Storting.

Bilde
Regjeringen og Stortinget er igjen ute på ville veier. Av Jim T. Slaaen Eidsvold 1814 av Oscar Arnold Wergeland Eidsvold 2016 - Kanskje  bildet over kunne blitt noe lignende dette, om det skulle blitt oppdatert til nåtidens politikk. Den 10. juni 2016, viste flertallet på Stortinget nok engang sin forakt for norske lover.  Norge - et offer for kommunazismen og internazismen På onsdag den 8. juni 2016 kl 10:01:07 la Liv Signe Navarsete frem et representantforslag for Stortinget etter § 39c i Stortingets forretningsorden. Altså: Stortingets forretningsorden. Kapittel 4: § 39 Behandlingen av proposisjoner og forslag: c) legges ut til gjennomsyn for representantene i minst én dag og deretter føres opp på dagsordenen til behandling Representantforslaget i pdf-format her. Den 10. juni 2016: Dagsorden (nr. 91) 8. Representantforslag fra stortingsrepresentantene Trygve Slagsvold Vedum, Marit Arnstad og Liv Signe Navarsete om en uavhe
Les mer her

Exit Utøya - Hvor ufattelig naiv er det mulig å bli Mads A. Andersen.

Bilde
Av Jim T. Slaaen Exit Utøya - En oppfølging. Den virkelige Arbeiderpartirosen Arbeiderpartiet holder karrièrekurs Hvor ufattelig naiv er det mulig å bli. Mads A. Andersen som har vært med i Verdens Gang (VG) sin spesialopprettede 22. juli-gruppe helt fra den ble opprettet, burde tatt sin jobb litt mer seriøst, og ikke minst sitte inne med mer kunnskap om fakta i saken. Han viser klare mangel på velkjente vitneforklaringer og opplysninger i denne artikkelen fra 24. juli 2013 . Men når en er betalt for å stikke hodet opp en viss plass  på Jens Stoltenberg og AP-regimet, eller er livredd for at VG skal miste mediestøtten (tidl. pressestøtten), kan en ikke forvente annet enn at det kommer mannskit ut kjeften på slike som han. Hadde det vært skikkelig tak og litt ransakende journalisttalent i Kråkerøyfyren, hadde han turt å bringe Eskil Pedersens ”Exit Utøya” ut og frem i media slik at kanskje en dag at fakta en gang for alle kom frem i saken. Ikke fortsatt fulgt d
Les mer her